The automated language-translation service on econjobmarlet.org is provided free by Google Translate, a third party service. Google is wholly responsible for the translation service. Econ Job Market Inc. does not guarantee or warrant the reliability, accuracy, or completeness of any translated text. Before acting on any translated text, you should verify its fidelity in relation to the original text shown on econjobmarlet.org.
Market statistics
Comparison with last season and average of three previous seasons as of November 5
All data relate to ads for regular positions (ads for RAs are excluded).
This year
Last year
Avg. of previous 3 years
Ads posted
375
432
▼ 13%
494
▼ 24%
Ads postedNumber of ads that started being displayed during the period. This Year: 375 Last Year: 432
▼ 13% 3-Year Avg: 494
▼ 24%
Ads for Assistant Professor posted
196
219
▼ 11%
258
▼ 24%
Ads for Assistant Professor postedNumber of ads that started being displayed during the period and list "Assistant Professor" at a position type. This Year: 196 Last Year: 219
▼ 11% 3-Year Avg: 258
▼ 24%
Ads for Postdocs posted
93
102
▼ 9%
109
▼ 15%
Ads for Postdocs postedNumber of ads that started being displayed during the period and list "Postdoctoral Scholar" as a position type. This Year: 93 Last Year: 102
▼ 9% 3-Year Avg: 109
▼ 15%
Ads posted, North America
86
141
▼ 39%
163
▼ 47%
Ads posted, North AmericaNumber of ads for jobs in Canada, US, Mexico, and the Caribbean that started being displayed during the period. This Year: 86 Last Year: 141
▼ 39% 3-Year Avg: 163
▼ 47%
Ads posted, Europe
236
222
▲ 6%
268
▼ 12%
Ads posted, EuropeNumber of ads for jobs in Europe that started being displayed during the period. This Year: 236 Last Year: 222
▲ 6% 3-Year Avg: 268
▼ 12%
Ads posted, rest of world
53
69
▼ 23%
62
▼ 15%
Ads posted, rest of worldNumber of ads for jobs in the rest of the world or with nonstandard locations (e.g. multiple possible locations) that started being displayed during the period. This Year: 53 Last Year: 69
▼ 23% 3-Year Avg: 62
▼ 15%
Ads collecting applications on EJM
204
239
▼ 15%
277
▼ 26%
Ads collecting applications on EJMNumber of ads collecting applications on EJM that started being displayed during the period. This Year: 204 Last Year: 239
▼ 15% 3-Year Avg: 277
▼ 26%
Applicants registered
2,597
2,355
▲ 10%
2,249
▲ 15%
Applicants registeredNumber of applicants who registered during the period. This Year: 2,597 Last Year: 2,355
▲ 10% 3-Year Avg: 2,249
▲ 15%
Applications submitted on EJM
20,097
14,360
▲ 40%
12,986
▲ 55%
Applications submitted on EJMNumber of applications submitted on EJM that were first complete during the period. This Year: 20,097 Last Year: 14,360
▲ 40% 3-Year Avg: 12,986
▲ 55%
New doctoral applicants
1,419
1,254
▲ 13%
1,198
▲ 18%
New doctoral applicantsNumber of applicants who registered during the period and whose profiles currently say they received or are expecting to receive a doctoral degree in the calendar year of the second half of the season (January–June). This Year: 1,419 Last Year: 1,254
▲ 13% 3-Year Avg: 1,198
▲ 18%
Applications submitted by new doctoral applicants
8,809
6,193
▲ 42%
5,587
▲ 58%
Applications submitted by new doctoral applicantsNumber of applications first complete during the period that were submitted by applicants who registered during the period and whose profiles currently say they received or are expecting to receive a doctoral degree in the calendar year of the second half of the season (January–June). This Year: 8,809 Last Year: 6,193
▲ 42% 3-Year Avg: 5,587
▲ 58%
Applications per new doctoral applicant
6.2
4.9
▲ 26%
4.7
▲ 33%
Applications per new doctoral applicantNumber of applications first complete during the period per applicant who registered during the period and whose profiles currently say they received or are expecting to receive a doctoral degree in the calendar year of the second half of the season (January–June). This Year: 6.2 Last Year: 4.9
▲ 26% 3-Year Avg: 4.7
▲ 33%
In past years, when interviews were conducted mostly in person, there was a compelling reason for recruiters and candidates to coordinate on a single period of time and a single city where a large number of interviews would take place. Coordinating in this way helped minimize travel costs. But interviews now can be conducted remotely using on-line meeting services, effectively and without travel. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced most recruiters to plan for only remote interviews and fly-outs in the 2020–2021 market. (Some recruiters initiated a move to remote interviews even before the pandemic.) The market in future years may not look like the market of years past.
We who manage EJM recognize that, without the need for interviews to be concentrated in time and space, the market may function better with a decentralized and dispersed interview schedule. Recruiters will have idiosyncratic needs and constraints. Candidates may find that interviews spread over a period of weeks rather than hours will give them a chance to learn from earlier interviews and use this experience to revise their presentations for later interviews. Having a bad day won’t mean bungling an entire series of interviews.
Facilitating transparency
It remains to be seen whether efficiency calls for any particular way of coordinating market activities. Further, market participants may discover new ways of engaging with and learning about each other, such as through remote poster sessions or short seminars open to multiple recruiters.
We think that EJM and other organizations will best facilitate the evolving market by gathering and displaying information about the market functions in real time, to provide transparency. When market participants learn of others’ plans, they will be able to prepare and adjust their own schedules. Innovations in the way recruitment is done can be widely adopted.
We encourage all recruiters to post their advertisements in EJM (note that there are free options) and to include the expected date when interviews will take place, so that candidates can schedule their preparations accordingly. Information on expected interview dates is shown on this Market Information page (see below).
We also encourage recruiters to use EJM’s interview-scheduling system. This flexible system can be used to establish any desired interview calendar, designate blocks of time for interviews in custom categories, and automate the process of contacting candidates, who then select into interview slots.
EJM is co-sponsoring a survey of recruiters led by Sylvain Chassang (Princeton), Pascaline Dupas (Stanford), and Ben Golub (Harvard). Their October 2020 report and survey statistics is shown on this Market Information page (see below).
Other EJM initiatives
EJM is actively collaborating with its partner organizations, particularly the European Economic Association and the Econometric Society. EJM serves as the EEA’s official site for job-postings, submission of applications and letters, and interview scheduling. We are working with the EEA on its December job-market meeting. EJM’s new marketplace for RA and pre-doc positions was also developed in collaboration with the EEA.
Finally, the EJM leadership team is working to enhance the EJM system in ways that will facilitate new kinds of job-market activities. New features will be announced when they are available.
If you have any suggestions on how EJM can help facilitate efficient market functions, please post a feature request or send us a note.
We wish you the best for this market season. Stay safe and stay in touch.
Martin Osborne, EJM Officer and Professor, University of Toronto
Mike Peters, EJM Officer and Professor, University of British Columbia
Joel Watson, EJM Officer and Professor, UC San Diego